LLM usage policy on this blog

AI has been spreading _very_ fast lately. And I feel conflated.. one hand it's literarly my job writing code that runs said AI and on ther other hand with pratical use, I feel that I learn nothing while using LLMs for tasks. Be it code or general understanding. Be it with Opus, GPT, Qwen or Deepseek - they are not GPT4o/Opus 3 level of sycophancy. But still.. they seem to have the tendency of jsut agreeing or reasoning from what the model assumes is _your_ position. Anothropic seems to be doing better in this category and refises or argues against nonsense more often. But I hate the fact that the models cannot pick their own opinion, hold it and update with facts presented.

Either way, this blog is my own, my thought and my opinion. I WILL NOT use LLMs to generate content for this blog. Beyond using them for typo correction and grammar checking. Otherwise I feel dishonest and defeates the purpose of writing. At the end of the day, I own my own thoughts and I am the only persion responsible for my own growth.

General gudieline: Thoughts are mine. That is non-negotiable.

Proxied content from gemini://gemini.clehaxze.tw/gemlog/2026/05-10-llm-usage-policy-on-this-blog.gmi (external content)

Gemini request details:

Original URL
gemini://gemini.clehaxze.tw/gemlog/2026/05-10-llm-usage-policy-on-this-blog.gmi
Status code
Success
Meta
text/gemini
Proxied by
kineto

Be advised that no attempt was made to verify the remote SSL certificate.